Mamie's Meanderings

A medley of musings in a meandering manner.

Thursday, January 08, 2009

The Miramichi as Setting in Richards' Novels

David Adams Richards sets his books in an area of northeastern New Brunswick known as "the Miramichi." I grew up in this area, so many of the place names and locales are familiar. However, the Miramichi is a widespread area: it includes the Bay itself and the Miramichi River, the source of which is a couple of hundred miles in the interior. It includes dozens of communities, forests, mines, and agricultural land. It includes fishing villages and two large towns, Newcastle and Chatham, recently amalgamated to be the City of Miramichi.

As I read Richards' novels, I don't look for geographic exactness. I find a vagueness to the setting - there is familiarity and yet the details are not always correct. It is like a remembered landscape with some elements clearer than others, distances sometimes compacted or expanded, a running together of time and place.

In The Lost Highway there is mention of a "giant ferris wheel" seen in the distance across the river. This could only be the ferris wheel at "the Ex," the Miramichi Agricultural Exhibition held in Chatham every August. Yet, although one of the characters in the novel is readying his vegetables to take to "the Ex" (a possibility), I don't think that other details of the locale of the story (a stretch of highway between Bartibog and Burnt Church) support a visual sighting of Chatham which would be twenty to thirty kilometres upriver.

Similarly, Richards uses detail in a rather off-hand way: an arrested man is taken to the Richabucto jail (correctly spelled "Richibucto" although definitely pronounced "Rich-a-bucto" by the locals), but later in the story he is now at Renous (the federal penitentiary). In another instance, a priest has to go to "Millerton" to conduct a service, and, while indeed, there is a community called "Millerton" on the Miramich, it is highly unlikely that a priest from Bartibog would be travelling that far to conduct a service.

I love though how David Adams Richards throws in New Brunswick references that, for me, are highly connotative. In The Lost Highway, Amy, a high school girl, "would not get the Beaverbrook scholarship." There is no explanation to whom 'Beaverbrook' refers, but the "in the know" reader immediately recognizes Lord Beaverbrook, Max Aitken, who grew up in Newcastle and whose statue graces the town square and whose name is proudly displayed at the Lord Beaverbrook Arena. It is little touches like this that make Richards' novels come alive for me.

Richards' use of "the Miramichi" as setting has been called symbolic and mythical and I have to ask myself: what does that mean? what does it stand for? The natural setting itself looms large, often a bleak and hostile environment with winter storms, craggy rocks, dense forests, and perilous waters from which a living must be garnered by the hardy souls who live in the region. And yet "the Miramichi" is embracing and compassionate; it holds its humanity (both the noble and the base, the greedy and the generous) in its bleakness and in its beauty. In Richards' works you get such images as "the great desolate bay," but also the quiet beauty of "as night fell, and the cry of the gulls faded and the shore birds slept, their wings turned inward like miniature pterodactyles on the waves."

Sunday, January 04, 2009

Something to think about; who is the narrator?

Wow, I can't believe I'm on here again! I have been thinking about the book I just finished: David Adams Richards The Lost Highway. As you read the book, you are intrigued as to the identity of the narrator for there are occasional hints such as "our little church" or "Amy my love" or an occasional "I", but in the end, the book does not reveal anything. And yet, we come away with the distinct impression of a real person with strong opinions and beliefs who is telling this story. Here are a few of the opinions of this narrator: He (presumably "he") has problems with the moral relativism of the secular world-view so prevalent today where "approval" and "disapproval" are the criteria for "right" and "wrong," ("call yourself independent but only do and say what your friends do and say") rather than absolutes as set out by the authority of the Church. He (the narrator/ Richards?) does not dismiss the Church and it's apologists so easily, and makes some wonderfully sarcastic comments as, for example about Alex: "he mocked G.K. Chesterton and C.S. Lewis and applauded Dan Brown." Another line made me laugh out loud: "his whole life was as positive as a terribly right-thinking member of the New Democratic Party." You get the impression that he (the narrator/Richards?) sees that as leaving something to be desired. The narrator has little use for those with "a little knowledge," who don't think deeply, who dismiss the past easily, who "blow in the wind."
Richards' books always leave me thinking!

Saturday, January 03, 2009

Blame the Spell Checker?

Is there ever a book that one reads today that does not have spelling errors? I guess the word processor spell-checker is the culprit as the errors are usually in words that are homonyms, but maybe the editors should shoulder some of the blame too! Here are a few from my latest book (Canadian author/Canadian published/Giller prize winner- NO EXCUSE!!).
"Debris littered the sight...." (site)
"...this worked on a plain....." (plan? plane?). I had to read the paragraph several times and "plain" was repeated three times; it's possible that "plane" would work as in"they were discussing the matter on an elevated plane of thought", but it's more likely that the intended word was "plan."
The worst error in this book (to me anyway) is the mis-spelling of a place name: "Richabucto" instead of "Richibucto".

Thursday, January 01, 2009

Another New Year's Day

Another New Year's Day and it seems a good day to get back to my blog. Haven't written for a few months. I think I miss the writing group I was in, the motivation. And yet, I often find myself musing about something and wanting to write. As usual on New Year's Day, I spent the day taking my Christmas tree down and putting decorations away: there is a quietness to the task as I take a second look at several small ornaments collected lovingly over the years. Many are gifts from family or friends: there are the two beautifully smocked balls made years ago by a cousin; Santas from a sister; angels from a sister-in-law; several made by school children. All part of the memorabilia of life!

I am reading the latest David Adams Richards book The Lost Highway. I am fascinated by this writer: just what is he getting at? In this, as in his other work, I can see that he hates hypocrites; he despises pseudo-intellectuals; he questions those who glibly dismiss tradition and the Church; he finds strength and compassion and heroism in the everyday, in the little "insignificant" people. And yet, he is able to cast a cold eye on those same everyday folk: they can be morally callous, ignorant, racist, stupid and narrow-minded as well. In this book I am trying to figure out who the narrator is and I've been writing down a few clues as I go along. More later!!